Does The Us Government Still Hold A Cheese Surplus?

The question of whether the U.S. government has a cheese surplus has sparked curiosity and debate, rooted in historical context and modern agricultural policies. In the 1980s, the government famously amassed a massive stockpile of cheese due to dairy price support programs, leading to the infamous government cheese distributed to low-income families. While such large-scale surpluses are less common today, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) still manages dairy reserves through programs like the Commodity Credit Corporation, occasionally purchasing cheese to stabilize prices and support farmers. As of recent years, fluctuating dairy markets and trade policies have raised questions about whether a surplus exists, highlighting the ongoing balance between agricultural support and market dynamics.

Explore related products

MRE Cheddar Cheese Spread Combo – 24 Pack | These MRE Spreads Are NOT Military Surplus – Sourced Directly from USA Govt Contractor by Long Life Food Depot

$30

MRE Cheddar Cheese Spreads - Individual 1oz. Cheese Packets available in Classic Cheddar Cheese and Jalapeno Cheddar Cheese Flavors - Authentic USGI Ration Components, select 12, 24, 48 or 100 Pack! (12, Cheddar)

$13.99

Emergency ration army survival food canned Gouda cheese 200g can MRE 7 oz can all natural (1 can)

$17.99

Glacier Ridge Farms Smoked Gouda Gourmet Spreadable Cheese 8oz (One Cup)

$9.89

Wisconsin Brick Cheese Sampler (2lbs)

$17.75

Manchego Cheese Wheel – Approx. 2 lbs – Spanish Sheep’s Milk Cheese Aged 3 Months – Authentic D.O.P. Product of Spain

$59.99

Historical cheese surpluses in the US

The United States has a long history of cheese surpluses, often tied to agricultural policies aimed at stabilizing dairy markets. One of the most notable periods occurred in the 1980s, when government subsidies and price supports led to a staggering accumulation of cheese in cold storage. By 1984, the government held over 500 million pounds of surplus cheese, a quantity so vast it could have provided every American with nearly two pounds of cheese. This surplus was a direct result of policies designed to support dairy farmers by guaranteeing minimum prices for milk, which inadvertently incentivized overproduction.

To address this glut, the government implemented creative distribution programs. One of the most famous was the donation of surplus cheese to food assistance programs, schools, and even foreign countries. For instance, in 1985, the USDA distributed 75 million pounds of cheese to low-income families through the Temporary Emergency Food Assistance Program. This not only helped alleviate the surplus but also provided a valuable resource to those in need. However, the recurring nature of cheese surpluses highlights the challenges of balancing agricultural support with market demand.

A comparative analysis of historical surpluses reveals a pattern of boom-and-bust cycles in dairy production. In the 1930s, during the Great Depression, the government purchased surplus dairy products to support farmers and feed the hungry, a strategy echoed in later decades. The 1980s surplus, however, was unprecedented in scale due to the expansion of dairy herds and technological advancements in milk production. By contrast, modern surpluses, such as those seen in 2016, are smaller but still significant, often exacerbated by global trade tensions and shifting consumer preferences toward non-dairy alternatives.

For those interested in understanding or mitigating future surpluses, a practical takeaway is to advocate for policy reforms that align dairy production with actual demand. This could include adjusting federal milk marketing orders, promoting dairy exports, or incentivizing the diversification of dairy farms into other products. Consumers can also play a role by supporting local dairy producers and choosing products that utilize surplus dairy, such as processed cheese or whey-based items. By learning from history, stakeholders can work toward a more sustainable dairy industry that minimizes waste and maximizes value.

Government cheese programs overview

The U.S. government’s cheese surplus, a relic of agricultural policy, has roots in the 1980s, when dairy price supports led to stockpiles of 500 million pounds of cheese. This excess wasn’t hoarded in secret bunkers but distributed through programs like the Temporary Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP), which still operates today. TEFAP channels surplus commodities, including cheese, to food banks and pantries, serving low-income households. Eligibility varies by state but generally targets families at or below 130% of the federal poverty level. Recipients receive pre-packaged boxes containing staples like cheddar or mozzarella, often paired with grains and proteins. While the surplus isn’t as massive as in the Reagan era, the program remains a safety net, blending agricultural policy with hunger relief.

Consider the mechanics of these programs: surplus cheese is purchased by the USDA through the Commodity Credit Corporation, which stabilizes farm prices by buying excess dairy. This cheese is then distributed to states based on population and need. For instance, Texas receives over 10 million pounds annually, while smaller states like Vermont get around 500,000 pounds. Local agencies handle the final distribution, often through monthly allotments. A typical household might receive 2–3 pounds of cheese per month, depending on family size. Critics argue this system perpetuates overproduction, but proponents highlight its dual benefit: supporting farmers and feeding the hungry. Practical tip: if you’re a recipient, pair government cheese with fresh produce from local food banks for balanced meals.

From a comparative perspective, the U.S. cheese surplus programs differ sharply from European models like the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). While both aim to stabilize markets, CAP focuses on direct subsidies and production quotas, whereas the U.S. emphasizes surplus redistribution. For example, France’s CAP payments incentivize dairy farmers to reduce output, whereas U.S. programs absorb excess production. This approach has led to cultural quirks: “government cheese” became a symbol of both welfare dependency and resourcefulness in the 1980s, inspiring recipes like “government cheese casserole.” In contrast, European surplus programs rarely enter public consciousness, as excess is often exported or destroyed. The U.S. model, for better or worse, is more visible—and more debated.

Persuasively, the continuation of cheese surplus programs hinges on their ability to adapt to modern challenges. With rising obesity rates, some argue distributing calorie-dense cheese exacerbates health disparities. However, fortified varieties, like those enriched with vitamin D, could address nutritional gaps in underserved communities. Policymakers could also explore partnerships with nutritionists to educate recipients on healthy consumption. For instance, pairing cheese with whole grains and vegetables could mitigate its high fat content. Ultimately, the program’s survival depends on balancing agricultural interests with public health—a delicate but achievable goal. Practical takeaway: advocate for diversified food packages that include both surplus commodities and fresh, nutrient-rich options.

Causes of cheese surplus today

The U.S. dairy industry is currently grappling with a significant cheese surplus, a phenomenon that has raised concerns among farmers, policymakers, and consumers alike. One primary cause of this surplus is the overproduction of milk, driven by advancements in dairy farming technology and the consolidation of larger, more efficient farms. Modern dairy operations have increased milk yields per cow through improved genetics, nutrition, and automation, leading to a supply that often outpaces domestic and international demand. This imbalance is exacerbated by the long shelf life of cheese, which allows producers to store excess milk in processed form, further contributing to the surplus.

Another critical factor is the shift in consumer dietary preferences. Over the past decade, there has been a noticeable decline in per capita cheese consumption in the U.S., partly due to the rise of plant-based diets, lactose intolerance awareness, and health-conscious trends. For instance, the average American consumed approximately 37 pounds of cheese in 2022, down from 40 pounds in 2014. Simultaneously, the market has seen an influx of alternative cheese products made from nuts, soy, and other non-dairy sources, which have gained popularity among younger demographics. These changes in consumption patterns have left traditional dairy producers with excess inventory.

Trade policies and global market dynamics also play a significant role in the cheese surplus. The U.S. has faced challenges in exporting cheese due to tariffs and trade disputes, particularly with key markets like China and Mexico. For example, retaliatory tariffs imposed during the U.S.-China trade war in 2018 led to a 50% decline in U.S. cheese exports to China. Additionally, the strength of the U.S. dollar has made American cheese more expensive for foreign buyers, reducing its competitiveness in the global market. These trade barriers have limited outlets for surplus cheese, forcing it to remain within the domestic supply chain.

Lastly, government policies, particularly those related to dairy price supports and subsidies, have inadvertently contributed to the surplus. Programs like the Dairy Margin Coverage (DMC) provide financial assistance to farmers when milk prices fall below a certain threshold, encouraging continued production even in oversupplied markets. While these measures aim to stabilize farm incomes, they can create a disincentive for producers to adjust their output in response to market signals. As a result, the surplus persists, leaving the government with the challenge of managing excess inventory, often through purchases for federal food assistance programs.

To address the cheese surplus, stakeholders must consider a multi-faceted approach. Farmers could diversify their product offerings to include value-added dairy items or explore alternative crops. Policymakers might revisit trade agreements to open new export markets and reform dairy support programs to better align with market demand. Consumers, meanwhile, can be educated about the nutritional benefits of cheese and encouraged to support local dairy producers. By tackling these causes collectively, the industry can work toward a more balanced and sustainable supply chain.

Explore related products

Cheese Spread, Shelf Stable, Wisconsin, Great as Snack Dips for Pretzels or Veggies, (1pk, Aged Cheddar)

$11.99

Widmer’s Brick Cheese – 2.25 lb Half Loaf | Buttery & Creamy Authentic Wisconsin Brick Cheese | Perfect for Detroit Style Pizza & More

$46.5

Bega Cheese A Real Canned Cheese From Australia- 100% Pure No Artificial Colors or Flavors-Great For Hurricane Preparedness Emergency Survival Long Term Storage Food Earthquake Kit(Cheese, Full Case)

$249.99

Canestrato (Incanestrato) Cheese Plain -1 Pound Slice Imported Italian Sheep Milk Cheese

$32.98

Double Gloucester layered with Stilton Cheese (1 lb)

$64.99

Treeline Cheese - Vegan Cheese Assortment - Herb Garlic, Scallion, Pimento

$59.5

Impact on dairy farmers and prices

The U.S. government's cheese surplus, a relic of agricultural price support programs, has tangible consequences for dairy farmers and market prices. When the government purchases excess dairy to stabilize prices, it inadvertently creates a safety net that can discourage farmers from adjusting production to real demand. This dynamic often leads to overproduction, as farmers continue to supply milk knowing the government will absorb the surplus. The result? A glut of cheese in storage and downward pressure on prices, squeezing profit margins for dairy producers who aren’t insulated by large-scale operations or diversified revenue streams.

Consider the ripple effect on small and mid-sized dairy farms. These operations, which often lack the economies of scale of their larger counterparts, are particularly vulnerable to price fluctuations. When the government’s cheese surplus depresses market prices, these farmers face a stark choice: sell milk at a loss or reduce herd sizes, both of which threaten their financial viability. For example, a 10% drop in milk prices can translate to a $20,000 annual revenue loss for a farm with 100 cows, assuming an average production of 20,000 pounds of milk per cow annually. Without access to alternative markets or value-added products, such farms are left at the mercy of a distorted market.

To mitigate these impacts, dairy farmers can adopt strategic practices. Diversifying into niche markets, such as organic or grass-fed dairy, can insulate them from the volatility of commodity prices. Investing in on-farm processing—turning milk into cheese, yogurt, or butter—allows farmers to capture more value per gallon. For instance, a gallon of milk sold as fluid milk might fetch $3, but processed into cheese, it could yield $10 or more. Additionally, participating in supply management cooperatives can help align production with demand, reducing the likelihood of surpluses that drive prices down.

A comparative analysis of regions with and without significant government intervention reveals stark differences. In states like Wisconsin, where dairy is a dominant industry, farmers are more reliant on government programs and thus more exposed to the consequences of surpluses. In contrast, regions with stronger local markets and direct-to-consumer sales, such as Vermont, experience less price volatility. This suggests that policy reforms encouraging market-driven solutions, rather than government stockpiling, could benefit farmers in the long term.

Ultimately, the cheese surplus issue underscores the need for a balanced approach to dairy policy. While government intervention can provide short-term stability, it risks creating long-term dependency and market distortions. By empowering farmers with tools to adapt—whether through diversification, value-added processing, or cooperative models—policymakers can foster a more resilient dairy industry. The goal should not be to eliminate surpluses entirely but to ensure they don’t become a chronic burden on farmers and prices.

Current status of cheese reserves

The U.S. government’s cheese reserves, once a symbol of agricultural surplus, have undergone significant changes in recent years. As of 2023, the USDA reports that the government holds approximately 1.2 billion pounds of cheese in storage, a figure that, while substantial, is far from the peak levels seen in the 1980s. This reduction reflects shifts in agricultural policy, market dynamics, and consumer trends. For context, the all-time high in 1984 was over 600 million pounds of cheddar alone, stored as part of price support programs. Today’s reserves are primarily composed of cheddar, mozzarella, and American cheese, held in cold storage facilities across the Midwest.

Analyzing the current status reveals a delicate balance between supply and demand. The government’s cheese reserves serve as a buffer to stabilize prices and support dairy farmers during market downturns. However, the rise of private cheese inventories has complicated this role. In 2022, private cheese stocks exceeded government holdings for the first time in decades, indicating a shift toward market-driven solutions. This trend raises questions about the necessity of federal intervention in the dairy sector. Critics argue that maintaining large reserves can distort prices, while proponents emphasize their role in preventing farmer bankruptcies during oversupply crises.

For consumers, the current status of cheese reserves has practical implications. While the government no longer distributes surplus cheese directly to the public as it did in the 1980s, reserves still influence retail prices. A well-managed reserve can prevent price spikes during shortages, ensuring affordability for households. However, excessive stockpiling can lead to wastage, as cheese has a finite shelf life, typically 6–12 months in optimal storage conditions. To mitigate this, the USDA has implemented programs to donate surplus cheese to food banks, benefiting low-income families while reducing waste.

Comparatively, the U.S. approach to cheese reserves differs from that of the European Union, which maintains a more proactive role in dairy market regulation. The EU’s Public Intervention system allows for direct purchases of butter and skimmed milk powder but not cheese, relying instead on export subsidies and production quotas. This contrast highlights the U.S. focus on flexibility and market adaptation. For dairy farmers, understanding these differences is crucial, as it impacts pricing strategies and long-term planning. For instance, U.S. farmers may benefit from diversifying into specialty cheeses, which are less likely to be stockpiled and command higher prices.

In conclusion, the current status of U.S. cheese reserves reflects a nuanced interplay of policy, economics, and consumer needs. While reserves remain a vital tool for market stability, their role is evolving in response to changing dynamics. For stakeholders—from farmers to consumers—staying informed about these trends is essential. Practical tips include monitoring USDA reports for inventory updates, diversifying dairy product offerings, and advocating for policies that balance farmer support with market efficiency. As the dairy industry continues to adapt, the cheese reserves will likely remain a key, though increasingly streamlined, component of U.S. agricultural strategy.

Frequently asked questions