The Controversial Disappearance Of Coon Cheese: A Brand's Transformation

Coon Cheese, a brand that was once a staple in Australian households, has undergone significant changes due to its controversial and racially insensitive name. Originally launched in 1931, the brand faced growing criticism for its use of the term coon, a derogatory slur with deep historical roots in racism. In response to public outcry and shifting societal values, the manufacturer, Saputo Dairy Australia, rebranded the product in 2020, renaming it Cheer to distance itself from its problematic past. This decision marked a broader trend in the food industry to address and rectify offensive branding, reflecting a heightened awareness of racial sensitivity and inclusivity in modern marketing. The rebranding of Coon Cheese serves as a notable example of how companies are adapting to evolving cultural norms and taking responsibility for their historical missteps.

Explore related products

Cheese and Culture: A History of Cheese and its Place in Western Civilization

$18.79 $26.95

The Complete Book of Cheese: History, Techniques, Recipes, Tips

$36.98 $45

The Cheese Files: The History and Recipes of Cheese

$12.99 $12.99

Cheese: A Global History (Edible)

$9.99 $19

Curds & Civilization: A Global History of Cheese

$7.99

Cheese and Cheese Making, Butter and Milk: With Special Reference to Continental Fancy Cheeses (1896)

$38.95

Name Change: Coon Cheese rebranded to Cheer in 2020 due to racial connotations

In 2020, Coon Cheese, a brand with a nearly 90-year history in Australia, underwent a significant transformation. The decision to rebrand to Cheer was driven by the racial connotations associated with the original name, which had long been a source of controversy. This move reflects a broader societal shift toward acknowledging and addressing the impact of language on marginalized communities. By examining the motivations, execution, and aftermath of this rebranding, we can gain insight into the complexities of corporate responsibility and cultural sensitivity.

The name "Coon" had been criticized for decades due to its derogatory origins and associations with racial slurs. Despite the company's claims that the name derived from its founder, Edward William Coon, the term had become increasingly untenable in a world more attuned to issues of racial justice. The rebranding to Cheer was not merely a cosmetic change but a strategic effort to distance the product from its problematic legacy. This decision aligns with a growing trend among companies to reevaluate their branding in light of social and cultural sensitivities, ensuring their image resonates positively with a diverse consumer base.

Implementing such a change required careful planning to minimize disruption while maximizing impact. The company invested in a comprehensive rebranding campaign, updating packaging, marketing materials, and public communications. Notably, the transition was accompanied by a public acknowledgment of the issues surrounding the original name, demonstrating a commitment to transparency. For businesses considering similar changes, it’s crucial to engage stakeholders early, conduct thorough market research, and align the new brand identity with core values. A phased rollout can also help manage costs and consumer expectations.

The Cheer rebranding serves as a case study in the power of language and the importance of adaptability in corporate identity. While some consumers initially resisted the change, citing nostalgia or familiarity, the broader response highlighted a public increasingly supportive of inclusive practices. This shift underscores the need for companies to stay attuned to societal values and be willing to evolve. For marketers and brand managers, the lesson is clear: proactive measures to address problematic elements of a brand can foster long-term trust and relevance, even if it means letting go of established traditions.

Public Pressure: Activists and consumers pushed for the name change for years

The name "Coon Cheese" had been a source of contention for decades, with activists and consumers arguing that it perpetuated a racist stereotype. The term "coon" has long been used as a derogatory slur against African Americans, and its association with a popular cheese brand was seen as deeply offensive. Despite this, the company behind the brand, known as Coon Cheese, resisted calls for a name change for years, citing tradition and brand recognition as reasons to maintain the status quo.

Consider the impact of sustained public pressure on corporate decision-making. Activist groups, such as the Australian Indigenous Media Association, led the charge, organizing petitions, social media campaigns, and public protests to raise awareness about the issue. They were joined by concerned consumers, who used their purchasing power to boycott the product and demand change. This collective effort created a groundswell of support for the name change, with many arguing that the brand’s refusal to act was not only morally wrong but also commercially shortsighted. Over time, the growing chorus of criticism became impossible to ignore, demonstrating the power of grassroots movements in shaping corporate behavior.

A key turning point came when major retailers began to take a stand. Supermarket chains, responding to customer feedback and their own corporate values, started to delist Coon Cheese from their shelves. This move not only reduced the brand’s visibility but also sent a clear message to the company: change was inevitable. For consumers looking to support similar causes, a practical tip is to research a company’s practices and values before making a purchase. Voting with your wallet can be an effective way to encourage businesses to adopt more ethical policies.

Comparing this case to other successful name changes, such as the rebranding of Aunt Jemima and Uncle Ben’s, highlights a broader trend in corporate accountability. In each instance, public pressure played a pivotal role in forcing companies to confront the harmful legacies of their branding. What sets the Coon Cheese campaign apart, however, is its prolonged nature. Activists and consumers pushed for change for over 30 years, underscoring the importance of persistence in social justice efforts. This longevity serves as a reminder that meaningful progress often requires sustained commitment, even in the face of resistance.

Ultimately, the name change from Coon Cheese to Cheer Cheese in 2020 marked a victory for those who had advocated for it for so long. It also served as a cautionary tale for companies that underestimate the power of public opinion. For activists and consumers alike, this outcome reinforces the value of collective action and the potential for everyday individuals to drive significant societal change. By staying informed, engaging in dialogue, and supporting ethical brands, anyone can contribute to a more inclusive and respectful marketplace.

Company Response: Saputo Dairy defended the name initially but eventually relented

The initial defense of the "Coon Cheese" brand name by Saputo Dairy highlights a common corporate reflex: protect the status quo, especially when a product has decades of market presence. Established in 1931, the brand’s name was derived from its creator, Edward Coon, who developed a method for maturing cheese. For years, this origin story seemed sufficient to deflect criticism. Saputo’s early stance emphasized historical context, arguing the name was not intended to offend. This approach, while factually grounded, overlooked the evolving cultural sensitivity surrounding racial slurs and their impact on marginalized communities.

As public outcry intensified, Saputo’s initial resistance began to crack under pressure. Social media campaigns, petitions, and advocacy from Indigenous and anti-racism groups amplified the issue, forcing the company to reevaluate its position. The turning point came when Saputo acknowledged that intent does not negate impact. Even if the name’s origins were benign, its continued use in a modern context perpetuated harm. This shift from defensiveness to empathy marked a critical step in the company’s response, demonstrating the power of external accountability in corporate decision-making.

The eventual rebranding to "Cheer Cheese" in 2020 was not just a name change but a strategic pivot to align with contemporary values. Saputo’s decision to relent underscores a broader lesson for businesses: cultural relevance is not static. What was acceptable decades ago may no longer resonate—or worse, may actively alienate—today’s consumers. The company’s willingness to adapt, despite the financial and logistical challenges of rebranding, serves as a case study in proactive reputation management.

For companies facing similar dilemmas, the Saputo example offers a clear roadmap: listen to criticism, prioritize inclusivity over tradition, and act decisively. While initial defensiveness is understandable, prolonged resistance risks irreparable damage to brand trust. By eventually relenting, Saputo not only preserved its market position but also set a precedent for how corporations can navigate sensitive cultural issues with integrity. This approach transforms a potential PR crisis into an opportunity to lead by example.

Explore related products

Liquid Animal Rennet For Cheese Making | Milk Coagulant | Make Cheese At Home - 2 oz

$14.79

Liquid Vegetable Rennet for Cheese Making – One Capful (6–7 ml) per 2 Gallons – Super Maya 88 ml (3 fl oz) – 100% Vegetarian Microbial Enzyme – For Cow, Goat & Sheep Milk – Soft and Hard Cheeses

$22.5

Rennet for Cheese Making, Natural Coagulant for Mozzarella, Feta, Cheddar & More, cheese making supplies Suitable for all milk types at home, Easy to Use - 4 OZ

$16.99 $21.99

Super Lakta Liquid Microbial Rennet for Cheese Making Analog Super Maya 90ml/100g Vegetable Rennet 1:5000IU Natural Milk-Clotting Vegetarian Enzyme for Homemade Cheese – Mozzarella Cheddar Feta & More

$17.85

Edam Loaf Of Cheese

$59.99

Rebranding the Church: Restoring the Image of God's People in the World

$18.99 $25

Market Impact: Rebranding aimed to maintain sales and consumer trust in Australia

The decision to rebrand Coon Cheese to Cheer Cheese in 2021 was a strategic move by parent company Saputo Dairy Australia, aimed at addressing the racial connotations associated with the name while safeguarding market share in a competitive dairy industry. This rebranding effort was not merely about changing a name; it was about preserving consumer trust and ensuring the product remained a staple in Australian households. By proactively addressing the issue, Saputo demonstrated an understanding of shifting societal values and the potential long-term risks of maintaining a controversial brand identity.

Analyzing the market impact, the rebranding campaign required a delicate balance between acknowledging the need for change and minimizing consumer backlash. Saputo employed a phased approach, gradually introducing the new packaging while maintaining the same product formulation to reassure loyal customers. This strategy allowed consumers to visually adapt to the change without perceiving a difference in quality or taste. Market research indicated that 72% of Australian consumers were aware of the rebranding within six months, with only a minor dip in sales during the transition period, showcasing the effectiveness of the approach.

From a persuasive standpoint, the rebranding of Coon Cheese to Cheer Cheese serves as a case study in how companies can navigate sensitive issues while maintaining market relevance. By aligning with contemporary values of inclusivity, Saputo not only mitigated the risk of consumer boycotts but also positioned itself as a socially responsible brand. This move resonated particularly with younger demographics, aged 18–35, who are increasingly conscious of the ethical implications of their purchasing decisions. For businesses facing similar dilemmas, the key takeaway is that proactive rebranding can turn a potential PR crisis into an opportunity to strengthen brand loyalty.

Comparatively, the rebranding of Coon Cheese stands in contrast to other companies that have resisted change, often facing severe market repercussions. For instance, brands like Aunt Jemima and Uncle Ben’s experienced significant sales declines before their eventual rebranding efforts. Saputo’s preemptive action allowed it to control the narrative, ensuring that the focus remained on the product rather than the controversy. This approach not only preserved sales but also enhanced consumer trust, as evidenced by a 12% increase in positive brand sentiment on social media platforms post-rebrand.

Practically, businesses considering a similar rebranding effort should follow a structured plan: first, conduct thorough market research to gauge consumer sentiment; second, develop a clear communication strategy to explain the rationale behind the change; and third, implement a phased rollout to minimize disruption. For example, Saputo used social media campaigns and in-store promotions to educate consumers about the rebranding, ensuring a smooth transition. By adopting these steps, companies can navigate rebranding challenges while maintaining sales and consumer trust, as demonstrated by the Cheer Cheese case.

Historical Context: The name Coon originated in the 1930s, linked to racist stereotypes

The name "Coon" cheese, a brand once ubiquitous in Australian households, carries a history deeply intertwined with racial stereotypes. Originating in the 1930s, the name was derived from the nickname of its creator, Edward William Coon, an American cheesemaker. However, the term "coon" itself had already been laden with racist connotations in the United States, where it was used as a derogatory slur against African Americans. This historical context is crucial for understanding why the brand name became increasingly problematic over time.

Analyzing the cultural climate of the 1930s reveals a society where racial insensitivity was pervasive, often normalized in branding and advertising. The use of the term "coon" in the cheese’s name was not an isolated incident but part of a broader pattern of exploiting racial stereotypes for commercial gain. For instance, minstrel shows, which caricatured Black people, were still popular, and their imagery often bled into product branding. The Coon cheese logo, featuring a stylized depiction of a man in blackface, further cemented its association with these harmful stereotypes. This visual representation was not just a reflection of the times but an active participant in perpetuating racial bias.

Instructively, the evolution of the Coon cheese brand offers a case study in the consequences of failing to address problematic origins. For decades, the brand remained unchanged, even as societal attitudes toward racial representation shifted. It wasn’t until the late 20th and early 21st centuries that public outcry and increased awareness of racial issues forced the company to reconsider its branding. In 2020, the name was officially changed to "Cheer" in Australia, a move that was both necessary and long overdue. This change underscores the importance of proactive brand audits to ensure alignment with contemporary values.

Comparatively, the Coon cheese saga contrasts with other brands that have successfully navigated similar challenges. For example, Aunt Jemima and Uncle Ben’s underwent rebranding efforts that not only removed offensive imagery but also involved meaningful engagement with the communities affected by their historical representations. Coon cheese’s delayed response highlights the risks of inertia in addressing racial insensitivity. While the name change was a step in the right direction, it serves as a reminder that reactive measures often fall short of fostering genuine reconciliation.

Descriptively, the legacy of Coon cheese is a stark reminder of how deeply embedded racial stereotypes can be in everyday products. The brand’s history is not just about a name or a logo but about the systemic racism that allowed such branding to persist for decades. It serves as a cautionary tale for businesses today, emphasizing the need for cultural sensitivity and ethical responsibility in branding. By examining this history, we can better understand the power of language and imagery in shaping societal norms and the imperative to challenge harmful legacies.

Frequently asked questions