Why America's Cheese Surplus Keeps Growing: Causes And Consequences

The United States has been grappling with a significant cheese surplus in recent years, a phenomenon that has raised questions about the country's dairy industry and its economic implications. With over 1.4 billion pounds of cheese in cold storage as of 2023, the surplus is a result of various factors, including increased milk production, efficient manufacturing processes, and changing consumer preferences. As the dairy industry continues to produce more cheese than the market demands, the surplus has led to declining prices, impacting farmers and manufacturers alike. Understanding the reasons behind this surplus is crucial in addressing the challenges faced by the industry and finding sustainable solutions to manage the excess inventory.

Explore related products

Milk Money: Cash, Cows, and the Death of the American Dairy Farm

$29.95 $28.95

Aspects of Dairy Economics: a Summary of Further Research Into the Economics of Milk Production by the Provincial Agricultural Economics Service, 1957-1960

$15.95

The Small-Scale Dairy: The Complete Guide to Milk Production for the Home and Market

$34.23

Meatonomics: How the Rigged Economics of Meat and Dairy Make You Consume Too Much―and How to Eat Better, Live Longer, and Spend Smarter (Men Birthday Gift, for Readers of Comfortably Unaware)

$4.91 $21.95

Economics of Dairy based cropping systems: Crop Dairy mixed farming

$55

Economic and Functional Characteristics of Farm Dairy Buildings

$29.95

Overproduction by dairy farmers

The United States has been grappling with a cheese surplus for years, and one of the primary culprits is overproduction by dairy farmers. To understand this phenomenon, consider the sheer scale of milk production: in 2020 alone, U.S. dairy farmers produced over 220 billion pounds of milk. Much of this milk is funneled into cheese production, which has outpaced domestic consumption. This imbalance isn’t accidental—it’s a result of systemic factors that incentivize farmers to produce more milk than the market demands.

Analytically, the root of overproduction lies in the structure of the dairy industry. Farmers often operate on thin profit margins, forcing them to maximize output to stay financially viable. Advances in technology and genetics have allowed cows to produce more milk per day—up to 70 pounds on average, compared to 20 pounds in the 1950s. While this efficiency is a triumph of agricultural science, it has created a supply glut. Additionally, government policies, such as subsidies and price supports, inadvertently encourage overproduction by providing a safety net for excess milk, which is often converted into cheese and stored in government reserves.

From an instructive perspective, dairy farmers could mitigate overproduction by adopting demand-driven practices. For instance, diversifying into niche markets like organic or grass-fed dairy products can reduce reliance on commodity cheese production. Implementing better supply chain management tools, such as real-time data analytics, could help align production with market needs. Farmers could also explore alternative uses for milk, such as producing whey protein for the health and fitness industry, which is growing at a compound annual growth rate of 7.5%. These strategies require investment and education but could alleviate the surplus while opening new revenue streams.

Persuasively, it’s clear that overproduction isn’t just a farmer’s problem—it’s an economic and environmental issue. The surplus cheese often ends up in government storage facilities, costing taxpayers millions annually. Excess milk production also strains natural resources, as dairy farming is water-intensive and contributes to greenhouse gas emissions. By curbing overproduction, the industry could reduce waste, lower environmental impact, and create a more sustainable model for future generations. Consumers can play a role too by supporting local dairy farms and choosing products that prioritize quality over quantity.

Comparatively, the U.S. dairy industry’s overproduction contrasts sharply with practices in countries like New Zealand, where production is tightly aligned with global demand. New Zealand’s Fonterra cooperative, for example, controls approximately 30% of the world’s dairy trade by focusing on export markets and value-added products. In contrast, the U.S. dairy sector remains heavily domestic-focused, with limited flexibility to adjust production levels. Adopting a more export-oriented approach, as seen in New Zealand, could help U.S. dairy farmers balance supply and demand while tapping into international markets.

Descriptively, the impact of overproduction is visible in the vast cheese stockpiles held by the U.S. government. At its peak in 2017, the surplus reached 1.4 billion pounds—enough to provide 17 pounds of cheese to every American. These reserves are stored in cold warehouses, often at taxpayer expense, and are occasionally distributed to food assistance programs. While this helps address food insecurity, it doesn’t solve the underlying issue of overproduction. The sight of mountains of cheese in storage serves as a stark reminder of the disconnect between supply and demand in the dairy industry.

Reduced export demand globally

The global appetite for American cheese has waned, contributing significantly to the mounting surplus within the United States. Once a reliable outlet for excess production, international markets have become less receptive to U.S. dairy exports due to a combination of economic shifts, trade policies, and changing consumer preferences. This reduction in export demand has left American cheese producers with a growing inventory, exacerbating the surplus problem.

Consider the impact of trade tariffs and geopolitical tensions, which have disrupted traditional export channels. For instance, retaliatory tariffs imposed by key trading partners, such as Mexico and China, have made U.S. cheese more expensive and less competitive in these markets. In Mexico, a 20% tariff on U.S. cheese in 2018 led to a 15% drop in exports within the first year. Similarly, China’s tariffs on U.S. dairy products have shifted their import focus to countries like New Zealand and the European Union, where trade agreements offer more favorable terms. These barriers have not only reduced the volume of cheese exports but also forced U.S. producers to seek alternative markets, often with limited success.

Another factor is the rise of local dairy industries in emerging markets, which have begun to meet their own cheese demands. Countries like India and Brazil have invested heavily in their dairy sectors, reducing their reliance on imports. For example, India’s dairy production grew by 6% annually between 2015 and 2020, enabling it to become nearly self-sufficient in cheese. This trend, coupled with shifting dietary preferences toward plant-based alternatives in some regions, has further diminished the global demand for American cheese.

To mitigate the effects of reduced export demand, U.S. cheese producers must adopt strategic measures. Diversifying export markets by targeting untapped regions, such as Southeast Asia or the Middle East, could help offset losses in traditional markets. Additionally, investing in product innovation—such as developing cheese varieties tailored to local tastes—can enhance competitiveness. For instance, creating milder, lower-sodium cheeses for health-conscious consumers in Europe or exploring halal-certified options for Muslim-majority countries could open new avenues for growth.

Ultimately, the decline in global export demand is a multifaceted challenge that requires proactive solutions. By addressing trade barriers, adapting to market dynamics, and innovating product offerings, the U.S. dairy industry can work toward reducing the cheese surplus and securing a more sustainable future. Without such efforts, the surplus will likely persist, straining producers and distorting domestic markets.

Trade wars impact sales

The U.S. cheese surplus, which hit a record 1.4 billion pounds in 2019, wasn’t solely a product of overproduction. Trade wars, particularly the retaliatory tariffs imposed by China, Mexico, and Canada, played a pivotal role in stifling exports. Before the trade disputes, these countries were major importers of American cheese, but tariffs as high as 25% made U.S. products uncompetitive in global markets. For instance, Mexico, the largest importer of U.S. cheese, imposed a 20% tariff in 2018, causing exports to plummet by 15% within a year. This sudden loss of foreign markets forced domestic cheese to pile up in storage, exacerbating the surplus.

Consider the ripple effect on dairy farmers and processors. When export sales drop, the entire supply chain suffers. Farmers, already operating on thin margins, face reduced demand for their milk, while processors are left with excess cheese that must be stored or sold at a loss. The trade war with China, for example, led to a 50% decline in cheese exports to the country, a market that had been growing steadily before tariffs were imposed. This isn’t just a numbers game—it’s a livelihood issue. Small and mid-sized dairy operations, which account for 40% of U.S. milk production, are particularly vulnerable to these market shocks.

To mitigate the impact of trade wars on cheese sales, diversification of export markets is critical. While traditional markets like Mexico and China remain important, exploring opportunities in Southeast Asia, the Middle East, and Africa could reduce reliance on any single market. For instance, the U.S. Dairy Export Council has been actively promoting American cheese in countries like Vietnam and the Philippines, where demand for dairy products is rising. However, this strategy requires significant investment in marketing and infrastructure, and its success isn’t guaranteed in the short term.

A cautionary note: relying solely on export diversification isn’t enough. Domestic consumption must also be bolstered to absorb excess cheese. One practical approach is to incentivize food manufacturers and restaurants to incorporate more cheese into their products. For example, subsidies for cheese-based processed foods or public-private partnerships to promote cheese consumption could help. Additionally, consumers can play a role by choosing American-made cheese products over imports, though this requires effective branding and education campaigns to highlight the quality and variety of U.S. cheeses.

In conclusion, trade wars have been a significant driver of the U.S. cheese surplus, disrupting export markets and leaving the industry scrambling to adapt. While diversifying export destinations and boosting domestic consumption are viable strategies, they require coordinated efforts from policymakers, industry groups, and consumers. Without such measures, the cheese surplus—and its economic consequences—will likely persist, underscoring the interconnectedness of global trade and local agriculture.

Explore related products

THE BUSINESS SUCCESS GUIDE TO DAIRY FARMING: Comprehensive Insight To Modern Practices, Effective Nutrition, Milking Techniques, Farm Management, And Profit Maximization

$9.93

Dairy Economic Analyst Stainless Steel Insulated Tumbler

$20.99

Characteristics, Costs, and Issues for Organic Dairy Farming

$26.95

The Wisconsin Whey: Cheesemaking in the Driftless

$24 $30

The Economics of Dairy Marketing: An Annotated Bibliography (Classic Reprint)

$31.57 $26.97

Storey's Guide to Raising Dairy Goats: Breeds, Care, Dairying

$19.97

Consumer preferences shifting away

The American palate is evolving, and cheese is feeling the burn. Once a staple of the American diet, cheese consumption has plateaued, with younger generations leading the charge away from dairy. This shift in consumer preferences is a major contributor to the burgeoning cheese surplus in the US.

Millennials and Gen Z, in particular, are driving this change. Raised in an era of health consciousness and dietary diversity, they're opting for plant-based alternatives, lower-fat options, and global cuisines that don't always prioritize cheese. A 2022 study by the Plant Based Foods Association found that plant-based cheese sales grew 15% in 2021, outpacing the overall cheese market's growth. This isn't just a fad; it's a fundamental shift in how these generations approach food.

This trend isn't solely about health. Ethical concerns about animal welfare and the environmental impact of dairy farming are also influencing choices. Documentaries like "Cowspiracy" and "Food, Inc." have shed light on the realities of industrial agriculture, prompting consumers to seek more sustainable and ethical food sources. For many, reducing cheese consumption is a tangible way to align their dietary choices with their values.

Even within the cheese category, preferences are changing. Artisanal, locally produced cheeses are gaining popularity, while mass-produced, highly processed varieties are losing ground. Consumers are becoming more discerning, seeking out unique flavors, textures, and production methods. This shift towards quality over quantity further exacerbates the surplus of commodity cheeses.

The cheese surplus isn't just a problem for dairy farmers; it has ripple effects throughout the food system. Excess cheese ends up in processed foods, contributing to the overabundance of cheap, calorie-dense products that fuel public health concerns like obesity. It also puts downward pressure on milk prices, squeezing dairy farmers who are already operating on thin margins. Addressing the surplus requires a multi-pronged approach: encouraging dairy farmers to diversify their products, promoting cheese consumption in new and innovative ways, and supporting the development of sustainable and ethical dairy practices.

Government subsidies encouraging excess

The United States government has long provided subsidies to dairy farmers, a policy intended to stabilize incomes and ensure a consistent food supply. However, these subsidies often incentivize overproduction, as farmers are guaranteed a minimum price for their milk regardless of market demand. This system, rooted in the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933 and perpetuated through subsequent farm bills, creates a safety net that inadvertently encourages excess. When milk production exceeds consumption, it is often processed into cheese, a product with a longer shelf life, leading to the accumulation of vast reserves. For instance, in 2016, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) reported a cheese surplus of 1.4 billion pounds, equivalent to nearly 12 pounds of cheese per American.

Consider the mechanics of these subsidies: the USDA’s Dairy Margin Coverage program pays farmers when the difference between milk prices and feed costs falls below a certain threshold. While this protects farmers from financial ruin, it also removes the market-driven pressure to scale back production during periods of oversupply. Additionally, the government’s practice of purchasing surplus dairy products for federal food assistance programs further distorts the market. This dual system of support—direct payments and guaranteed purchases—creates a feedback loop where excess production is not only tolerated but effectively rewarded.

To illustrate, imagine a dairy farmer deciding whether to expand their herd. With subsidies in place, the risk of financial loss is minimized, making expansion an attractive option. Over time, as more farmers make similar decisions, the collective output surpasses consumer demand. The surplus milk is then processed into cheese, which is cheaper to store and transport than liquid milk. This process, while efficient in the short term, contributes to the growing stockpile of cheese in government storage facilities. The result? A surplus that strains storage capacity and depresses market prices, harming both consumers and smaller producers who cannot compete with subsidized operations.

Addressing this issue requires a reevaluation of subsidy structures. One potential solution is to tie subsidies to sustainable production levels rather than unlimited output. For example, the European Union’s milk quota system, in place until 2015, limited production to match demand, preventing surpluses. While such a system may face political resistance in the U.S., pilot programs could test its feasibility. Another approach is to redirect subsidies toward diversification, encouraging farmers to produce alternative crops or adopt practices that reduce reliance on dairy. By shifting incentives from excess production to sustainability, the government could mitigate the cheese surplus while supporting farmers’ long-term viability.

Ultimately, the cheese surplus is a symptom of a broader issue: a subsidy system that prioritizes short-term stability over long-term market balance. While the intent behind these policies is noble—protecting farmers and ensuring food security—their unintended consequences cannot be ignored. By recalibrating subsidies to discourage overproduction, the U.S. can move toward a more sustainable dairy industry. This shift will require collaboration between policymakers, farmers, and consumers, but the payoff—a balanced market and reduced waste—is well worth the effort.

Frequently asked questions